
Cutting The Chaff
First things first. I want to start with a clean slate by way of upgrading the terminology and removing the dead weight. Beginning with this post, I am no longer using the generic term of UFO. Depending on the context, the referring term will be unidentified air vehicle or anomalous aerial phenomenon. The word "alien" is no longer in use.Either craft occupants or anomalous humanoids will be used in context. The only way to become untangled from a spider web, is to cut the strings. Part One was the general concept of separating phenomenon into reports of probable stealth craft from anomalous aerial phenomenon. In other words, the extra-dimensional psychic effects from the hardware. That is not to say the two are unrelated, but that is an unknown correlation. The next,( Part Two) was the context of unidentified air vehicles as potential X craft. Part Three was the illustration of the dangers of belief and how belief toward an unknown phenomenon presents a clear opportunity to be manipulated by those beliefs.All three were of a theme involving plasma weapons systems. This last post examines the evidence that suggests a high energy field attributable to the harnessing of plasma technology is perhaps the most likely culprit for unidentified air vehicles. The main theme of the post is central to the post war era, the apparent arrival of anti gravity air craft. While the general public considers this technology the stuff of science fiction, they seemingly believe on faith that unidentified craft are pulsing through the night skies manned by extraterrestrials.At the same time, private research on anti gravity is hampered by the simple fact that the U.S government can take away your patent with impunity in a strange paradox upon the capitalist system, if it is determined to be vital to national security. Private contractors under the usual safety net as working for the Department of Defense have no such disincentives. Rather odd. As I have suggested, this strange dichotomy of belief and evidence is the result of propaganda reinforcing the nebulous extraterrestrial as the culprit despite the fact they have not communicated, landed for any coherent purpose, nor have shown any interest in our affairs should they exist.While there is more than enough evidence that there was something anomalous wafting over the globe in, more often than not, in apparent stealth until the advent of inexpensive video recorders etc. The last redoubt of an empty hanger puffed as the modern mythos of Roswell seemingly has had the intended effect, extraterrestrials and their equally nebulous and circumstantial footprint have led researchers in circles based on faked documents, rumor and perhaps the testimony of men who in the service of their country and it's national security, towed the company line. As I said in the previous post the Roswell is a decades old double cross.There is no conclusion because it is an intentional bluff. An increasingly (at least to this writer) obvious misdirection of attention.
Give them what they want, not what they need is the aftermath. They have played upon our own mistrust, harnessed it, and sold us a pig in a poke.
The Relationship of The Strength of Plasma Energy To Location
Plasma is known as the fourth state of matter, and is an electrically ionized gas. Energy is required to create plasma, and the plasma itself is widely variable in it's energy potential to the electromagnetic field it travels within. It's a means rather than an end. Energy may be dissipated from a plasma in the form of light or heat. In scientific terms, "plasma energy" would refer to the internal energy of a plasma compared against the internal energy of the same gas in its pristine state. A more technical explanation is found here: http://www.plasmas.org/basics.htm You can see like all phenomenon, plasma propagation is not a free lunch if you have to carry your battery around to energize it's field as the strength of a plasma field is strongly correlated to the strength of electromagnetic fields in is within. This correlation leads to potential avenues of investigation as the gravity field of our planet itself has anomalies as well as varying strengths in relation to their geographic locations. If unidentified air vehicles require a strong field as found in power transmission lines, or or generally utilize variations in the gravitational field, these locational identifiers might be correlations to the statistical probability of finding them at one location versus another. Our planet's gravitational field charted on a geographic map is far from being a monochrome.

Like the nature of gas itself, plasmas do not have a definite shape or a definite volume unless enclosed in a container. Consider a craft a container. Unlike gas, in the influence of a magnetic field, it may form structures such as filaments, beams and double layers which would have an influence on atmospheric effects in any visual sighting, depending on the local conditions in which they are found. Another area that perhaps is a specific flight path for such a craft in high orbit would be the ionosphere, which is the uppermost part of the atmosphere, unique in that it is ionized by solar radiation, which in turn, plays an important part in atmospheric electricity and forms the inner edge of the magnetosphere. Remember this failed experiment on the space ship Columbia? experiment:http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMSPACE09_2074/PV2009_6734.pdf
A picture is worth a thousand words. Harnessing the energy of the ionosphere is not a obtuse theory. I would love to see the failure analysis report on this one. Wouldn't you? Very interesting..did someone say lunch?
However, closer to the earth there is a phenomenon akin to a drift pattern,known as the ionospheric current, or solar wind. Another potential correlation in relation to plasma generation.The ionosphere has practical importance because, among other functions, it influences radio propagation to distant places on the Earth and was of great interest (as mentioned in the previous post) to Tesla. Pictured below is the flow of a ionospheric current.

Correspondingly the strength of the solar wind itself as it waxes and wanes may be an additional correlation. You can see ( which is the point of this simplified exercise) that the so called random appearances of unidentified craft may not be so much random as they are opportunistic. If your craft is dependent on the strength of a supporting field to generate a plasma, and it is prone to variations by location, availability and strength, well then, perhaps this can serve as a exploratory predictive model. Also these variations in the field may account for the sometimes "wobbling" effect seen in these craft.
Indications And Strange Evidence
Was a thunder storm the direct causation of ground effects or was it supporting the field of an unidentified craft, that in turn, was another opportunistically advantageous environmental condition for a plasma engine? Inquiring minds want to know. Oh, that's right, blame it on the Venusians or the men from Planet X again..
The Use of Plasmas As A Motive force
Another advantage to plasma energy is that it burns the atmospheric gases, allowing practically no atmospheric resistance, or drag. Using atmospheric gases to create a plasma motive force is not a screwball idea. For some light reading try "Plasma Kinetics in Atmospheric Gases." or "Development of a Plasma Source Using Atmospheric-Pressure Glow Discharge in Contact with Solution". The point is that there is a great deal of activity in atmospherically derived plasmas. However most researchers dont have the advantage of a annual twenty billion dollar black budget to dig too deeply. In the incredibly obscure CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICS VOL. 36, NO. 2-11 APRIL 1998, we find the tome; "Magnetic Levitation Force of Single Grained YBCO Materials In-Gann Chen*l, Jen-Chou Hsul, Gwo Janm™, Chin-Chen Kuo™, Haw-Jer Liu™, and M. K. Wu2‚Department of Materials Science & Engineering, National Cheng Kung University. Perhaps we would be better off looking for our answers elsewhere. Ask those wearing an appropriate shoulder patch. Good luck...the ruse is in the thread.

Well there's another route. Read "Guidelines to Antigravity" by Dr. Robert Forward, written in 1962 (available from the American Journal of Physics for a fee). Dr. Forward’s article describes several obscure tidbits in Einstein’s General Relativity theory that, simply put, indicate how moving matter can create unusual gravitational effects. Dr. Forward also defines six different kinds of antigravity in his "Indistinguishable from Magic" book: Aside from the obvious "weightloss" in free-fall as an astronaut in orbit; the first is to place a very heavy mass overhead to cancel the earth's gravity field. Secondly, we may use ultra-dense materials spaced very closely to the object we desire to be weightless. The last Newtonian idea, is to use various "guard" masses to reduce tidal forces on a test mass already in orbit on the space shuttle. From Einstein's theory, comes a fourth idea; that moving ultra-dense matter in a toroidal coil at high speed will generate a dipolar G-field.This is the premise behind the Nazi bell experiments. Fifth, the idea of dragging of inertial frames, which will pull objects along with them. Lastly, the sixth idea, is the possibility of negative matter (-m), just like negative charge, will reverse the direction of force; it moves towards you when you push on it. This brings us back to our wonderful plasmas.
There are any number of variations on this theme.http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/1281736.html
There is some controversy regarding Boeing's success in this anti-gravity field beginning some eight years ago as some have said the results have been nil, while Jane's Defense Weekly infers this is largely for public consumption.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/2157975.stm
As in our ever elusive "Nazi Bell" an extremely dense material moving at relativistic speeds would explain their use of Mercury plasma containing heavy ions. If the plasma spins at the correct velocity and the Mercury ions are also moving in a spiral, then the individual ions would be moving at a velocity perhaps thousands of times faster than the bulk plasma spin, in order to execute their "screw thread" motions. Anyway, the short version is a theoretical anti-gravity device utilizing plasmas. Don't get me started on red mercury, please.Lets stick to the velocity of heavy metals in a counter rotational plasma spin. In other words you use the atmosphere to generate an internal, containerized electromagnetic field which in turn drives the plasma to spin, which then depending on the velocity of the spin, attenuates a higher velocity heavy metal medium by which could perhaps create gravitational effects. its called plasma damping of gravitational waves, or some silly nonsense a medium blurted out while channeling Chubby Checker.Oh. look up "The propagation of gravitational radiation in dense media" or something similar to that. Plasmas are the stuff stars are made from as well as theories. Not miscalculated Mayan calendars.
..So perhaps there is a connection between plasmas, the atmosphere, gravity and these unidentified aircraft. Well, I'm tired of typing. My interest wanes toward this old loom. I never did get to the subject that was my original aim..the nasty effects of hanging around one these high voltage craft.Is there any way to uplift another form of atmospheric drag... on this topic? The convulsion of space time through gravitational effects are met in kind by a geometric, intellectual game of Twister where one's disturbed mind becomes a fractal bent into interesting biological shapes rather than endlessly slogging through the mire of moldering social superstitions on a warped Ouija Board. Is it that time again kids? See you next time on the dance floor. Someone wake up Vallee,he's snoring through the torch procession to Frankenstein's castle, or is it Dracula's domain these days? My arthritis is killing me, none the less..












+Feb+07.jpg)












