Quantum Entanglement and Experiential Correlations

The Equations of Translation.


The Layers of The UFO Onion and Signal Theory.
It is possible for a particle to interact with another particle in such a way that the quantum states of the two particles form a single entangled state. The definition of an entangled state is that it is not entirely independent of other states: its state is dependent on another state in some way. Because of this dependency it is a mistake to consider either state in isolation from the other. Rather we should combine the states and treat the result as a single, entangled state. Utilizing these principles in the last post examined the state of waking and the state of sleep in terms of consciousness, decoherence and coherence as an oscillating singularity. We examine the experiential processing and integration of information as might be the modality if one was entangled within a quantum event.


The Uncertainty Principle :The Referential Language of Reality.
You and I are in the midst of a conversation. I say the word, "spaceship" in the context of a sentence, and consequently upon hearing this word, in relation to the context of the sentence in which it is contained, you conceptualize the spoken word, which in of itself is referential to what is within your own conceptual models which most closely match this word. If you examine this conversation in terms of a potentiality within your receipt of this spoken word, you have a variety on images to apply to this word. Any number of images come to mind which constitute a set of images and within the context your identifying bias steers your processes of association upon one image. So within one spoken word within a language made of alphabetic sounds, you analyze the context in relation to the word by association which then is nested within a process of identifying the word as a semiotic image...whether it is the space shuttle, a Gemini space capsule, a movie image, what have you..these processes occur so quickly and are so embedded within your adaptation to language itself,in practical terms, they could be considered to be inseparable.However we can make distinctions.
1. The word is not the object referred to.
2. The context of the word attenuates meaning.
3. The meaning is a relativistic, subjective one.
4. Subjective choices as a potentiality are sorted by the bias of association.
5. The association which most closely matches your referential terms is chosen by your identification of a match.
6. The meaning is transferred to an image.
7. The image may or may not match the image in mind that was communicated by the speaker.

Transpostioning of Referential Language To Images:
If we take the process of communication onto another state, perhaps we can see correspondences to that of the spoken word given an added dimensionality in relation to meaning, which is a state of quantum measurement.
1. The context of the dream image, the setting is not the situation referred to.It is a metaphor.
2. The metaphor is a semiotic image for any given situation or context attenuates what transpires. Metaphor is, in this sense, by it's definition,from the Greek: μεταφορά - metaphora, "a transfer", in rhetoric "transference of a word to a new sense", from μεταφέρω - metaphero, "to carry over, to transfer") is language that directly compares seemingly unrelated subjects. ...
3. The meaning is relativistic, a subjective one.
4. Subjective choices of associations of images as a potentiality that most closely match your referential terms is chosen by your identification of a match by an image.
5. This meaning is a language of experiential and semiotic images
6. The image may or may not match in exactitude what is being examined or experienced outside of the observers terms.

The Observer Effect In Quantum and Semiotic Terms.
A word, an image in terms of the processes of both communication as well as the transference of these processes into images results in set of identifications by association that is not the object in of itself. A novel vehicle of space time. What is a novel vehicle in space time?



What Is A Vehicle For?
The choice of context again falls into play, which then in terms of this phenomenon is driven, steered and geared by consensus terms in relation to the images presented in a semiotic manner which is a containing conveyance that transports people or objects in relation to a task which is also a medium for the expression or achievement of something; "his editorials provided a vehicle for his political views"; "a congregation is a vehicle of group identity"; "the play was just a vehicle to display her talents." A vehicle is also any substance that facilitates the transmission of material that is mixed with it as a carrier as well as an object that can effectively transmit agents of influential and exterior states from one person to another. Whichever context in which this phenomenon is viewed in relation to it's context as well as a correlation to the facilitation of signal communications, it is highly effective.

Individuated Exposure As A Individuated Correlate To A Semiotic Process


Lets say the context of the nexus of a situation is one that is such that manifests as an awareness of one being tested, examined, weighed and as a result one suspects a significant unknown transformation of one in relation to this process. This may correlate to the image of an examining table, perhaps within the confines of a experiment, or process whose images are attenuated by association, identification as a close match in the process of simulating meaning within the context which correlates to a state of decoherence which matches a state of dreaming where semiotics process information as a experiential metaphor....the embedding of a novel positioning in relation to an interpenetration of ones most defining characteristic of sentience, which is a critical assumption of autonomy, may be translated in semiotic images as one being abducted from their normal state. The transference onto a platform that is in of itself representative of an altered state as well as the symmetry of effect is translated as tampering which may be by the process, translated as semiotic and experiential simulation as a match for genetic tampering..and so forth. There is also a closed loop upon which is a sub program of this interface, namely the published accounts, the illustrations..all of which provide a library of semiotic potential as a subset to individuation. The distribution of this viral signal noise is in direct relation to the repeatability of recorded accounts.

Any other outmoded and axiomatic theory will lead one down the twisting route of the proverbial garden path into a house of contradictory absurdities multiplied by fantasy through the weaknesses of human psychology from A to Z. None the less, this anomalous phenomenon requires a second, even a third look.