A Biological Virtual Reality and Close Encounters
This is the area of the physical brain that the mind is either inhibited or anticipates a response to a range of stimulus, of which the prefrontal limbic cortex of which we speak,it is interesting to note that this is in a direct association with memory as an indication of it's nature that is to say it utilizes environmental cues that are comprised of reinforcements and in turn are associated with reward or punishment to the system of which the mind occupies through various drives to adapt to maintaining it's stability in it's material relationships.Death is for most, the ultimate adversarial stimulus and as a result, as I have mentioned in the past there is always a anxiety at a subconscious level that continually peculates through our receptive senses that is also present as a sort of subliminal signal noise.
In other words the mind uses cues in it's simulating ill or beneficent events to direct an anticipation based on memory. What if there is no associative value in memory either reinforced or subjected to a embedded semiotic relationship of signs ( cues) and the signified ( identifier) to the stimulus which is what we are largely interested in in terms of incommensurable events? More on this later.
The point that I am attempting to place for your consideration is that society is largely the function of the limbic prefrontal cortex, which in Western social structures have importations of it's constituent members that are comprised of a behaviorism that is a incoherently bewildering binary code of do and do not, which, if this biology of the brain did not exist, would vanish instantaneously.All suppression of "do's and don'ts "would be turned off like a light switch. Think of many an close encounter beginning with Betty and Barney Hill, wherein they did not run, they, by their own accounts, were paralyzed.The assumption was this was accomplished by an external force, but was it? Conversion disorder is a condition in which patients present with neurological symptoms such as numbness, blindness, paralysis, or fits without a neurological cause whose source is associative in nature and yet perhaps as an equal possibility, the same effects can be demonstrated by the autonomy of biological systems that do not require an intercessor that is conscious of the process in of itself but is in terms of the effects, which are attributed to supernatural forces via bias projection when associations as semiotic imagery superimpose anthropomorphism. Our human culture historically preferred witches, demons and other place holders to inexplicable experiential effects of a neurobiological source.
In terms of neurobiology, one can easily self verify a utter lack of self discernment in a dream state between self and non self. In another words, try finding the non familiar stranger from within a dream as a provocative agent seemingly with possessed with an arms length autonomy with the reality outside of one's simulation of him or her within associative processes. You won't unless one is precognitive rather than post editorially prescribing identities to chimeras. The thought forms of dreams we ourselves structure as the intercessors of entangled processes do not require any assistance from without.
The common recollection of floating and not recalling the utilization of their somatic feet they normally use to traverse space might be another clue as to this experiential memory being akin quite literally to a vivid dream. They may have gone nowhere in a external sense but internally, they did, enough so to be driven by the associative functioning of the the limbic prefrontal cortex in relation to a physical paralysis.
We are all familiar with the somatic stress and the stresses upon the mind embedded within these systems between fight and flight in relation to a perceived threat as outlined above in terms of anticipation which in turn leads to perhaps a butterfly effect in the mind making order out of disorder by the creation of intermediaries. However if you added a stimulus that does not exist in memory, what happens to these relationships that involve conditioned responses that are societal and biological in nature that follow a script of a predictive, repetitive environment?
I suggest that perhaps the "deer frozen in the headlights" may apply. That is to say there is no routing in this circumstance of a unknown event. One could call this an interval or incommensurable gap in response, and yet it is not as if we "shut off", otherwise may may have died solely from the stress of reactive ambivalence.
And so..what occurs in this interval? The physical brain as I have said informs the mind and the mind informs the brain, all of which occurs in a virtual reality that simulates the environment through various signal processing velocities, editing, transcribing and forming non corporeal messages, that in turn are given form by our associations that are imprinted and just as a word is not the object it describes, and so in the directive of the pres-ynaptic systems in the brain, we have a very transient and yet profound state where information as a state that is yes and no, do and don't, right and left, which in relation to the binary of choices we are imprinted with also leaves what could be said to present an interval or "between states" state, that in turn is subject to associations, cues, images, semiotics that will interpret this matrix of signals, not surprisingly, as a simulation just as a dream is associative as cross talk formed as a virtual reality, we can definitely visualize dreams without the benefit of external photons.If I walk into a forest and come upon a length of green garden hose and mistake it for a snake, what outside sentient agency prompted this?. This is a ploy of an internal Trickster not one that is hanging out at the ranger's station to play mind games with no demonstrable long term effect in doing so. We want to structure everything like some mad architect within the purview of the mind in relation to the physical brain..You like this and dislike that without having to spend a great deal of time within a instantaneous reactive pose to reflect upon it. This is the ruse of our theoretical autonomy in relation to our conditioned non conscious reflexes.
Is it possible that all of the imagery and forms akin to dreams that are chronicled in the historical archives of UFO witness accounts in circumstances of close proximity, a self created simulation in the observer that has no correspondence with direct perception when faced with an unknown stimulus?
However even if this is so, this does not answer the nature of the stimulus, but it may answer the absurdly proliferate and cross pollinated forms and images of humanoids that are both shared and individuated at once so logically there is no one species of aliens because they exists in of themselves in the biology of our simulations.
What rare state of a energetic field or interactivity of multiple fields that is transient in nature be investigated as a primary causation that exceeds the capacitance of perception that creates a condition wherein the mind falls back upon it's own resources to simulate a false yet compelling dream narrative? In the next post, I want to share with you some tenuous concepts that are if anything, more provocative than extraterrestrials.

4 comments:
sorry for the late reply as it took me a few days to get through this via of the holidays,
Bruce,
I got about half way through reading your post here and just froze while staring at the computer screen. I was just as literally "deer in the headlights" choked up/goose bump covered/hair standing on end/blown away as your example here would allow for. Being over Fn' whelmed by the seemingly synchronous fact that as I was reading this your entry for 12/23/11 you were literally describing via your typical, albeit extremely powerful and intriguing ****verbiage, what I have been struggling to envision myself recently, as to what constitutes completely (in my layman's mind anyhow) hypothetically modeled scientific perceptual processes, pertaining PRECISELY in autonomous reflection, to your posted thoughts here, based on what I have been imaginatively (should read "in ignorant, yet best envisioned descriptive terms I know") stating as best I could while instinctively leaning HARD towards this linear reasoned process for the last few months. Albeit in a somewhat clumsy sort a way.
I will elucidate just how synchronized my mind is of recent with respect to your expressed thoughts here:
I literally awoke this mourning 12/24/11, roughly @ 4:00am(ish) , put some wood in the stove, sat back down and pushed the old recliner back still half brain sleep chemical induced. Just before nodding off to the white noise of the stove's blower I was dwelling in realization that our spacetime perceptual relevance seems to dictate that memory via it's relation to our reality's perceptual process is in fact seemingly best modeled as a loop. This would seem to indicate that the facility of memory itself cannot be placed in an absolute located sense, post cognition, either by means of an absolute integral delineated order of necessary process, or by random perceptual modeling as referenced by interpretively decoded environmental cues based on our reality's perceived orientation.
In reflection, after reading your blog entry here later that same day, it seemed a further reinforcing of the notion that as entangled information is *received, subsequently interpreted/decoded, reacted to and displaced, via the following rough draft (admittedly, much ongoing improvement required here!) outline consisting of my hypothetical modeling components that comprise our temporally referenced loop filtering and interpretive cognitive modeling broken down something like this:
end part 1 (part 2 contains astrix denoted key/s)
begin part 2:
(a) *waking status (consciousness in operationally typical transmittal/reception mode), temporal status (synchronized containment of our core energy signature, cycled to decay) and somatic status (physical life span in decay as well as the somatic relative localized modeling hypothetically reflecting our dimensionally specific physical containment via a finite bi-hemispherical synchronized spacetime relevance)
(b) sentience (emotional instinct based awareness modeling that reflects an interactive experiential perception uptake & interactive volition), reason (real time interpretive navigation interface including spacial displacement )
(c) Memory, for me, is a very easily confused medium/capacity/faculty/facility to consider. In my own case that's because my former orientation to it's temporally delineated nature was/is at times, almost too great a fog to over come when attempting to formulate hypothetical perception models. On a gut level memory seems a one way street, or rather possibly a specific static address on that same street in reference to a specific event or experience. However, due to the real and easily verified scientific revelations that memory is in fact a two way street that both color's reality model building, as well as supplying a seemingly infinite catalog of post temporal reference models consisting of limitless virtual experiential significance filters. I almost have to make myself visualize memory as a fluid medium within which most of these other subset components, (a) & (b) that comprise the hypothetical cognitive awareness model, maintain a routine, operationally buoyant status in which perceptual reality modeling takes place at both the impetus of displacement as well as temporally referenced linear retrieval. In fact, it might make more sense to visualize memory as being cognitively synonymous with spacetime itself. One can almost immediately begin to liken planetary spacetime distortion created by the overt physical impetus of great gravitationally bound bodies residing within itself, to the impact that analogous hypothetical connections might bear out in relation to our own reality's memory cue driven perception based experiential status and events of a high strangeness orientation.
begin part 3,
"intercessors of entangled processes"
Even though I fully realize in the context of your post here, and further more have to comprehensively agree in a full forward geared momentous fashion with your reasoning in as much, the above quoted passage from your writings equals IMO, an EXACT entitled description of "the what" and, "the who", at the core of the UFO phenomena itself. Synonymous with both the technology implemented, as well as the singularity required to possibly enact such navigation.
I KNOW that (at this point in the present time's openly revealed understanding anyhow) this is where my hypothetical reasoning turns from my awareness of the current scientific communities legitimate research based observations, to utter imagination based pseudoscience in what I view as anything but a presently stable empirical light.
This is to state firmly that I believe we are on the very precept of an unparalleled scientific paradigm shift. This is to further append such a projected guesstimate with the very notion that 50 years from now we will have discarded most of what we hold fast to presently within the realm of applied physics.
* (is the waking state synonymous with more so the concept of containment, or even progressively furthered, a sentient species indigenous spacetime relative conduit, through which the energy we consist of is bound via volition specific physical spacetime relevant orientation & locomotion?)
** (could this very "receiver" be humanity's gateway or segue to an internalized singularity that is not machine integrated but rather that which would facilitate a natural interface from which new and unexplored dimensional realms will become a navigational extension of our present spacetime orientation?
*** (as it is actually constantly both, which negates the formerly reasoned assumption that experiential events based on perceptually integral memory interfaced modeling, must originate, or occur, post an event as it takes place while referenced via our spacetime relevance, this further means in logical progression that the perception of reality itself may be based (originating within) on a temporal non locality prior to it attaining reference within our waking temporal/physical status orientation)
****(I love it man! PLEASE keep it coming Bruce, as I have learned more from you with respect to applied vocabulary in the last year than ANYONE else on the net. You REALLY have no idea just how much I appreciate and enjoy the routine manner you inspire me to "REACH" and expand my considerations.
Jeff
It is a a rare day in December, a post receives such a detailed exploration of it's content, and perhaps while others consider intercession from without, based on what the forms that arise from such events incur, the whole of the "look but don't touch" aspects of it very similar to dreams which are associative in nature as thought forms, it seems more probable these events are internalized although the forces that intercede as a field in the environment are far from a simple matter. We fall back on demons as much as we do extraterrestrials as ( you might say) thought forms as communicable memes that cross infect and superimpose themselves on what we ourselves create, not as a matter of autonomy as it reflects processing of the fluidity of the incommensurable.
Thank you for your thoughts.
Post a Comment