However the modality of cognition between visual and linguistic programming has the parallel processing of concepts based on thought, which then leads to a very complex set of behaviors in the relationship between the behavior of the creature and the mental representation of concepts imprinted by them through these processes as perhaps a complex ideo-motor response cubed. Perception is entrained by visual computations that are spacial that become internalized. The "idea"as something that is quasi-perceptual and pictorial in the imaging or imagination process is a visual epistemological foundation recycled through linguistics that as a modality can bypass the right angles of the rationality through the intellect, the whole of which are perhaps simply computational referents or terms for spacial relationships. In simple terms, there is not much difference between a dream and a thought, when it comes down to our basic vocabulary of behaviors. We may be awakened to find that words do not necessarily may have a meaning in relation to a real purpose other than those supplied by the stereotypes of suggestion. In the local colloquial language of the universe, we are just as likely to be illiterate know it all's that may be provided a developmental education.
The visual linguistic, as I call it. of the UFO as a meta-programming symbiotically oriented "chaotic" , seems to have become a viral implant in our spacial orientations at a deep level. As a chaotic, it's probabilistic effects appear random but in a quantum sense of "it depends on who is looking" it is more accurate perhaps to describe all of the observed variables as a feedback effect based on the variability of the observers own "spacial relationships" as semiotic text input into the phenomenon. Can we think of the UFO as a phenomenon best described as a visual language ? In other terms, we could say this phenomenon could be best described as visually spacial form of linguistic that we lack a transcription for, and so we "fill in the blanks" from out cultural recycling bin based on what the phenomenon "suggests" or "infers" from myth, from theology, from science fiction, from territoriality, from the human history of permanent warfare, etc.
One thing perhaps in the numbers game of probabilities is long range quantum based signal communications systems based on a visual language that would be akin to the monolith in Arthur C Clarkes remarkable work of "imagination" that requires a radical shift toward our comprehension of where the transcribing of the terms we use as realities are derived from in the nature of the dynamics of sentience itself. This form of ciphered visual cryptography that perhaps requires a "matching" quantum key has a elegance about it that is appealing to me in terms of coherence from the chaotic. Perhaps that's the best reason to discard it, but then when I look around me and look at the medieval plots foisted onto the UFO phenomenon, perhaps I'll keep it in my side pocket while peeling away the layers of the onion at hand.
Is there a algorithmic key within sentience itself that we lack, to possess the key to this quantum visual language, for which we lack a coherent language for, in a game of substitutions?
The answer may be obvious but to most, which translates into shoot first with propaganda, ask questions later. All of this may be as interesting for a few moments as a flea circus to a superior intelligence, as our presumptions are our recorded history as a substitution for reflection. The foundation of our faith in the managerial capacity to iron out the wrinkles in our portfolio as "the most intelligent" species on Earth makes the nexus of the UFO phenomenon in increasingly didactic terms of our own self importance as to be roasted or sent to the bliss of an ether.
It may be a case of neither one. This phenomenon may be ambivalent as to our own inbred opinions as the presumed axis as the subject of the object as far as emotional intelligence ,we are twelve year olds in a universe of adults. The transcription of the visible language of the UFO remains suspended through the centuries in the eyes of it's observers, surpassing every myth we ourselves have created. I suspect it plays a waiting game over an increasingly toxic dialog between ourselves and our habitat as well as each other. Coherency may be in the eyes of the beholder, not to be revealed by any disclosure other than those of our own foibles.
What hides in plain sight is an encryption, not a threat. If this is so, then we have a challenge to not only our linguistic foundations, but to the very roots of our spacial orientations as the internal variant of the external environment is based on stereotype and not the realities or multiple complexities of the living systems, thousands if not millions of them that are interconnected operating in parallel, each enfolded into the other.
One change in the distinction within this visual language of ours in all of it's forms, the rearrangement of one or four characters in this visual codex can mutate if you will, the orientation of the observer on a two-fold basis, which is the relationship between the observer and the observed, which if anything whatsoever about this phenomenon is true, than this is more profound that a piece of bendable metal. All of our relationships that are the basis of our internal language are like a causal house of cards, one stacked atop the other in a sequence much like DNA. This is so subtle that to my thinking, no one has looked at the epistemology of this visual mutation as an intentional insertion into our biological orientation that has everything to do with the linkage between perception and communication.. Whether it is intended for us as a potentially reciprocal dialog is up to us and thus far I have seen very little evidence beyond the demonic characterization of the phenomenon itself to attest that anyone is willing to say we do not know what this portends, but the ball is our court and not theirs. We have to reach upward rather than have lightning come down and explain itself to us.
Ever since Descartes removed the mind from the body we have taken a long detour to rediscover that they are deeply interconnected and that evolution is more than competitiveness as it is also a deeply reciprocal process attuned to the dynamics of maintaining a thermodynamic stability, one that is on the verge of collapse in the greatest mass extinction of species counted in millions of years. This is not rocket science, as they say.
Tampering with our evolution may have nothing to do with us personally from another perspective but there is no end run around us as the incoherent drivers of a profound instability in the ecology of not only relations between ourselves but the system we are embedded within. Once the game is in motion, you cannot simply remove a species without making a situation ten times worse. We learned that in our purposeful tampering with our neighboring animal populations. Context is more important as a targeting perception than the minutia of the phenomenon as a isolated subject of study. Again, common sense. What I am suggesting is the message is the medium.
In a previous post I noted that this is from the bottom up targeting individual cells rather than a meeting at the United Nations which of course be an accident waiting to happen which if this is a strategic mutation of our spacial orientation, then it follows that the classical models of esoteric schools of isolated the subject from their immediate environment is not a physicality we speak of, but one that is profoundly psychological. One viral implant mutates a chain reaction in the body of the communication systems that do not run through wires, for heavens sake. There is nothing to fear but change and I think if things continue such as they are, we will have real rather than metaphysical monsters of our own creation, to contend with. Are we alone in the universe?
The greater question is why we are isolated and I think the eloquence of the evidence is so overwhelming that we pose a threat and not the other way round should we attain the means to achieve the logistical capability to use vehicles to enter deep space.
I have little doubt of this, yet in a tour de force of psychology our so called experts have turned the equation the other way around which is the damned hallmark of denial itself. Whereas I think it is more probable that the medium is the message to be decoded as a visual linguistic, everywhere I turn in Ufology is fraught with one Darwinian reductionism versus the other that takes context entirely out of this equation, which is simply like an ingrown toenail. I am out of step with creating new mythologies but I am still swinging at a ball of wax paper. I have no real dialog with anyone in this field except a scant handful and in this case the course of democratic capitalism wins the day, but I have moved on, where the actual movement of the markers is taking place and not within the sociology of mythology. We venture off the map to seek new challenges as the intangible that appears material slowly comes into view and greets us with an equally open mind that transceives the common ground of uncertainty versus edicts.
