Monday, January 2, 2012

2012 to The UFO and The Mirrors Behind The Mirror: A Structural Pathology



Plastic Markers
When we reduce and divorce the inside circumference of the mind from the physical brain as two ends of a stick that serves us solely as a marker to measure the relationship of cognition and perception then it would seem we fall back on appearances that are deceiving in of themselves, as both the psychology and the foundational tenets of human behavior are a suggestive rather than a realistic appraisal of our being simply an extension of our environment rather than being an autonomous entity divorced from it.

The para in normal is entirely dependent on the relative position of the observer in relation to their awareness of this relationship that appears "upside down" in our hierarchy of origins toward perception and cognition that we postulate have neatly separated boundaries which we control, rather than being "controlled" or more accurately, manipulated by our insistence upon them.
Cross purposes, ruses, rationales, legislation, theologies all seemingly attempt to contain boundaries as we assign them to purposes dictated to us by our biology, which in turn create shared customs that are effects rather than causes in of themselves. The inability to legislate purpose in solely anthropomorphic terms is certainly a ripe area for investigation, in order to observe the non conscious drivers of all these propaganda's in play much like a reaction being mistaken for a stimulus, or for that matter, that they only exist in relationship to one another.

Structural Contamination
In all of the research I have done in paranormal matters, the naive realism of making structural pronouncements as quasi terminology that are simply fluid markers for what are the triggers for paranormal activity is astonishingly still a disquieting matter in terms of our prescientific difficulties in these matters while concurrently, this issue remain unrecognized in popular parlance.Our conceptual models of reality continually contaminate an ambivalent appraisal of them.


For example, one can make a persistent correlation that is neither correct or false. A repeatable correlation while being a reliable statistic does not translate into that the two variables being investigated are causally correlated. The bias in terms of the orientation of the relative position of the measurement at times over-rides a further examination of evidence, as conceptual terminology is applied that is a self serving legislation rather than recognizing the uncertainty in this structuring by superimposition.

Stereotyping Living Systems
Ufology is a good case in point. None of the conceptual terminologies applied to it have any relevance as to it's fluid nature to the extent that terminology has a higher evaluative hierarchy by users in solving it's nature rather than the evidence.
Suspicions become conceptual markers in a social and cultural environment that insists upon the ordering of intellectual conceits that in reality are largely ( in their aggregate sum) dictated by the absence of biological autonomy in terms of repeated behaviors, that are simply in large, a shared fantasy of  perceptual and cognitive autonomy  that applies bias projection through anthropomorphism to events that then suggest there is a humanoid outside agency rather than anything that falls outside of our stereotyping of nature.
Nature is far from the semi rigid structures that are legislated in human psychology to direct the behavior of organisms that have  no such naturally occurring structures inherent to them. All of nature is a moving target in search of a continually refined mirror image of the storage, transmission and transmutation of forms that are contingent in relationship as a whole, as if it were a proverbial hologram wherein one fractal can reconstitute the whole at any given position on the outer circumference of it's hidden nature, given that it is "frozen in place", which it is not. This is the difficulty of the mirrors behind the mirror whose nexus of manifestation contains more inter-relationships than we have the capability to count and yet, we utilize our scrim of autonomy in order to measure it. Not recognizing this contradiction makes for so many pratfalls and missed cues in the paranormal field, it is not surprising that only a few recognize the self prophecy of results, that we mistake for markers. Just as in the culture, just as in societies, just as in the paranormal field.

Structures and Permeability
The whole of society and human culture is based on the behaviorism of vested self interest toward the survival of the whole in terms of superimposing structures on behaviorism through the bias of strictures, what is allowed versus what is illegal, what is productive versus what is non productive toward the maintainability of the structure itself which has postulates of valuation that limit either ambivalence or challenge or both. and yet these structures are permeated and created by the lack of biological autonomy in behaviorism that creates transparent and elaborate and ritualized rationales that sweep these foundational psychological weaknesses under the rug, until, in the present tense, we stand on the rug atop a proverbial Mount Rushmore, unable as an aggregate sum, (not surprisingly) to alter the structures that dictate a repeated range of behaviorism. Man becomes an imprisoned extension of the various types of psychological and literal machines he created, thus the paranormal field is rife with fantasies of our our species equivalences, having omniscient power and will. The very nature of controls simply put, is a superimposition upon the lack of them.



The nature of nature plays no favorites, while we pick and choose. This comes across in the relationship between 2012 and Ufology, wherein even our lack of control dictating structural controls on our behavior, is superimposed on a orderly calendar of numerical measurements that control our fate from without that portrays the universe as ( no surprise) a machine. The UFO is largely seen as a machine for the same need to superimpose structure assumed to be from without, whereas it is non existent.

2 comments:

ThePeSla said...

Great Post,

Happy New Year!

The PeSla

Bruce Duensing said...

Thank you. The pathology that lurks behind the lure of many a investigatory motive is often it's downfall. Ufology is the best example of the conceptual framework overtaking the evidence. When I wrote "Manchurian Messengers" observing that the alleged abduction "patients' were carrying the messages of those who "researched" the phenomenon, rather than being assisted in determining the nature of their experiences, it was an excellent example of a pathological mindset contaminating a more ambivalent approach. So many approaches only reference the weakness of the psychology in those that approach a question in order to prove this or that.