Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The Extra Solar Variations


If we take extraterrestrials out of the possible causes of atmospheric anomalies, what are we left with?

Energy takes many guises. It is what you are reading, radio waves, you, a boulder, etc. Energy is information. According to science, this is indisputable. Some time ago, I wrote to a friend, Rick Phillips regarding an anomalous event that my wife and I experienced that dumbfounded us. We were enjoying a conversation on our patio here in North Carolina. A balmy late afternoon summer  retreat from the stifling heat and humidity of the day. From everywhere and nowhere it arrived. It was a sound unlike anything. As background to this account, this had occurred once before but my wife was absent. I had recounted this experience to her, and she thought it had a prosaic source although none came to mind. This sound was akin to a  large dynamo winding up. Not a "whirring" sound..but a slow increase arising from a stomach churning low frequency that to a high pitch. Then it turned off as if someone had flipped a switch. It is an account that must be qualified by "you have to have been there at the time"
Rick sent me various samples of sounds. Is it like this one? or Does it sound like this? All to no avail despite our best efforts for a time. The episode had slipped from my mind since it was pragmatically filed under "unexplainable".
Something strange and unknown is occurring in the atmosphere.



Whether you consider the source to be UFO's, localized and  transient energy anomalies like Dr Persinger suggests, the effects of yet to be categorized creatures, the mind's quantum entanglement, signs of a catastrophic event, unknown weather attributes, this event I experienced remains elusive in terms of pinning the tail on a stubborn donkey.



I tend toward Dr Persingers ruminations on natural causes that remain unknown of all of the above as the most probable explanation. To fog the situation more than it already is, I read an article that reminded me of George Hanson's work about the difficulty of determining an answer.In his book "The Trickster and The Paranormal", he provides a cogent explanation of :
  • Why parapsychology and UFOs are shunned by establishment science.
  • How anthropology and literary criticism apply to the paranormal.
  • Why psychic phenomena are associated with mystical practices.
  • Why tabloids often put paranormal features on their front pages.
Here is an example of what Mr Hansen outlined.

http://texasghosts.org/?p=292&preview=true

This morning a recollection came out of "nowhere". The recollection involved the phenomenon of mystery hums that are persistent, measurable and largely remain unexplained. What I had experienced...Was there a connection to mystery hums?

Commonly known as “The Hum”, it is sometimes referred to in terms of where it is located, such as the Taos Hum, Bondi Hum or the Bristol Hum.
Not everybody can hear it, but the “hearers” remarkably describe the hum in the same way. It appears to resonate at the 56 Hz frequency range. It doesn’t have a natural sound and by most accounts, the hum is reminiscent of a diesel engine running in the distance.
The hearers claim that the sound intensifies if you’re indoors and the vibrations can be felt through the skin. To make matters worse, the continuous hum has caused the hearers to suffer from loss of sleep, dizziness, anxiety, irritability and in one circumstance, suicide.
Although the hum is difficult to capture on audio, some of these mysterious hums have been identified. The hum on the Big Island of Hawaii is caused by volcanic activity. The hum in Kokomo, Indiana was traced to a DaimlerChrysler cooling tower fan emitting a 36 Hz tone and a Haynes International airport air compressor intake emitting a 10 Hz tone. But the other handful of word wide hums remains a mystery.
In 1993, the hearers of Taos, New Mexico petitioned Congress to investigate this unusual and most famous of hums. Their strongest theory was that the hum was artificially created by a United States Navy communication systems using ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) to communicate with submarines. In 1997, Congress directed a number of scientists from various respectable research institutes to look into this matter. Efforts to locate the cause of the hum were met with negative results.

Of course then there is  the tampering with the nature of atmospheric energy to create "anomalous" or "unnatural" effects in the twelve patents relevant to the HAARP project, as a propreitary technology in the name of the Raytheon corporation. Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent # 4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere; and/or Magnetosphere," was sealed for a year under a government Secrecy Order.
The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different; the radio frequency (RF) radiation was concentrated and focused to a point in the ionosphere. This difference throws an unprecedented amount of energy into the ionosphere. The Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per cubic centimeter, compared to others only able to deliver about one millionth of one watt.Enough for a very significant effect.

Both atmospheric and more terrestrial cases of strange resonances are auditory, both suggest a source of atmospheric resonance, either as a source or a carrier, both are an expression of an unknown energy source and energy being information, I seemed to be searching in a book whose bindings had become undone, and the pages were  scattered all around me.
 Another perspective. This is the general equivalence of that  all anomalies are "misperceptions."

http://doubtfulnews.com/2012/01/sounds-from-the-sky-reflections-on-historical-observations-and-recent-events/

Anomalies make for strange bedfellows. Rodney Collin  came to mind and his book "Celestial Influence" as well as Dr Persinger's ruminations on extra solar sources of anomalies being a potential influence on the atmosphere, which in turn creates terrestrial anomalies.The conceptual foundations for Collins work on the exchange of energy are the Law of Three, arguably similar to the triad of Thesis, antithesis, synthesis of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and the Law of Seven, the idea that the notes of the Western musical scale encode universal stages in essentially all developmental processes. Collin unites both of these schemata geometrically using the enneagram. Persinger uses traditional science. Do these two methodologies meet in the middle in a new conceptual basis of pantheism?



A basis of comparisons. From Stephen Wagner who has published some of my posts ,writes for About.com  recently posted a article entitled "Strange, unexplained sounds reported worldwide.." A compilation of reports, among them are market driven plants.

 http://paranormal.about.com/b/2012/01/14/strange-unexplained-sounds-reported-worldwide.htm

All of this resembles the UFO phenomenon, the intentional contamination of evidence by planting hoaxes from a variety of sources.
I have often summarized a spectrum of anomalies as "the changing relationship of the observer to the observed" to quote myself.  In regard to this phenomenon, what has changed? Or, more accurately, what is changing? None of these explanations in the links I posted sufficed to answer what my wife and I had experienced. Are there certain attributes of our planet in relation to the system it exists within (as a reciprocal process) that are in flux? In the next few posts, I hope to explore this possibility comparing Rodney Collins theories to that of Dr Persinger in order to dig out of the dark hole of the anomalous, which may lead to exchanging one for another. No Roswell games, no blonde Venusians, no spaceships or other sexed up idiocies. No propaganda, market driven lies.
Do any readers have any thoughts on this subject?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

May be mistaken about where I found one of Persinger’s videos, but I thought it was linked on your blog. He proposed that as our artificial magnetic field produced from communications technology might eventually override our experiences produced from natural field effects. At the time, I thought he meant that we would simply lose our ability to be affected by a field effect, but he didn’t mention how our telecommunications effects might influence us.

Maybe the changes are due to our ever increasing technology-based field effects, magnetic, electric and radiomicrowave. Would the difference in magnitude of frequency of those effects now produce more noise phenomena as well as an increased number of anomalous sightings to EM sensitive individuals? Would more and more people eventually become sensitive to field effects?

It sort of takes the fun out of the mystical and I'm not proposing that we may not be wired to experience anomalous events, but Albert Budden in his book Electric UFOs suggests EM pollution is the culprit. His studies don’t seem adequate to the task of explaining much of what he proposes, but it’s hard to throw out all of his theory due to his assumptions.

What if he’s correct in that those sensitive to EM pollution occasionally discharge the overload through anomalous experiences? It may be all wrong, but it’s something we might need to consider given that various places on earth have come to be known as vortices of energy and are linked to vision quests throughout history.

If so, are the Hessdalen Lights a phenomenon of magnetite in the atmosphere over a valley known for it’s iron ore content?

I’m woefully ignorant of the science, but am trying to explore so if this sounds like nonsense, maybe it is!

Bruce Duensing said...

Anon
I don't think what you wrote, any of it , was nonsense. I thought it was well considered. When you said it takes the fun out of the mystical, I tend to think of the possibilities, as mysteries that are mystical in that they drive imagination and curiosity, both of which, are mysteries and certainly are experienced as mystical, being able to envision concepts, like H.G Welles, or Einstein..Thanks for sharing your perspective.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for the kind reply, Bruce.

I was really trying to suggest that perhaps the addition of our telecommunications producing field effects may be an addendum one day to other theories on the topic.

I'm sorry I keep forgetting to include my name too.

Carol

Bruce Duensing said...

Carol,
You bring up an interesting point that really belongs in the considerations of investigating this phenomenon. I agree with you..thanks