The Roswell Game : A Hypothetical I-Beam

The 1945 Model of Extraterrestrial Advanced Technology

 Introduction to The Roswell Game Series
The definition of lunacy is being rigid in methodology and expecting different results. I do suspect very strongly that something strange is occurring in the atmosphere.That being said, it has been my experience, that this Roswell Game has been the greatest hindrance to the exploration of the causes of these anomalies and I also strongly suspect  it is a misdirection of attention. That being said as the postulate for this series, my aim is to take the best ax I can find and smash this ridiculous obstacle into little pieces as best I can. The reader can judge for his or herself how useful this is to open up the weak foundations of "because the nebulous they said so" as the central critical assumption that is a straw dog.. The possibility that a exquisitely constructed  hoax based on this premise is easy to plant and plan, based on only the utilization of self referential logic as the fulcrum of a free floating myth is more probable than the composite sum of the evidence if it is analyzed by logic rather than goofy belief systems.You might want to jump to the postscript.

 The Evidence Cited is The Missing Evidence
Structures used in the structure of a spacecraft must take into account axial loading, strain, torsion, shearing, and buckling. What is the purpose of an I-Beam? Simply put the I -Beam was invented to ensure the rigidity of a engineered structure to avoid bending and shear loads in the plane of the web. On the other hand, the cross-section has a reduced capacity in the transverse direction, and is also inefficient in carrying torsion. Torsion is the action of twisting or the state of being twisted which is to be avoided to ensure the rigidity of a structure. The reported I-Beam allegedly recovered from an alien spacecraft was bendable. However once free of torsion, it would supposedly resume it's previous semi-rigid state. This is exactly what you do not want in a spacecraft. Once the torsion that occurs in flight occurs, the structural integrity is compromised,  therefore the craft loses it's capability aerodynamically to fly. Did such a material exist and if so, is there any evidence beyond it's alleged existence, to support it's efficacy in the integrity of a spacecraft? The simple answer appears to be no. Ask any engineer to put a bendable metal as a support structure in a aircraft they will get a good chuckle out of your naivety.
If this is so, how did the misdirection of attention occur in the critical assumption that a bendable metal is advantageous to spacecraft and air craft design?
Because someone said it existed.
Lets discuss the reasoning behind the engraving of writing on a bendable I-Beam that is falsely or simply assumed to be a integral member to the structural integrity of a spacecraft. Is an bendable I-Beam a good location to place instructions or flight characteristics of the material if it is bendable? The critical assumption is that it was accessible to read. and was critical enough to engrave. Was this due to a recurring lapse of memory, a means to reconstruct the craft, flight instructions,? Well if it was engraved it was not graffiti. The assumption that it was engraved to be read by the flight crew must be taken into account.
Was this a necessity if they had the required navigational equipment, sensory monitoring, flight feedback and control modules?  Was it a engineering post-it note?
Lets say this is unlikely. Then what could the writing on the beam represent? Anyone who works with structural shapes knows that at times depending on the purpose and the materials used, structural shapes can be found to be engraved. Usually this can include information such as the date of manufacture, its weight, its dimensions and it's place of manufacture.The reason for this is the chain of distribution. In other words, someone not directly involved in the manufacturing of the shape would not have to look hither and yon to determine if this was the correct material as it appears to be, etc. Many users can have different purposes for the same material. So is there an alien distribution chain that has many users of the same material for differing purpose that would require them to be able to verify these data points in a post manufacturing scenario.?
Here is where we make a distinction between purpose built materials and general materials and specialty materials. Spacecraft and aircraft use specialty materials. You cannot use off the shelf aluminum as an example that is used to side a house to skin a high velocity aircraft as it's structural and mechanical characteristics are not applicable. So what would take the place of an engraving on a structural member of a specialized, one use material?
Its called the specifications with a scope of work A document that specify' s all the material to be used, how it is used and where it is used. Think of it this way, what would it be like to make a duplicate of an aircraft if you had to dissemble the first one to determine what was used to build a second one? This is extremely unlikely .Recall that this alleged artifact that is cited as evidence while it is missing allegedly represents a craft that is centuries ahead of us in the technological design, execution, and materials. Take another look at that I_Beam at the top of this post and consider the illogic of a bendable structural support that encourages a failure due to torsion during flight, an unnecessary engraving, and a willingness to believe any old tale because someone said it was so. Nothing more than that.
Further consider the state of our own comparatively primitive  technology in relation to a hypothetical one that is centuries advanced of our own. Composite matrix filaments, molecular engineering of materials, advanced thermoplastics etc Consider that these are some of the materials that are in the public domain and are proprietary and does not represent a full listing of advanced materials whose composition is withheld for security compartmentalization..Now consider a bendable hypothetical I-Beam  with engraving of hieroglyphics on it. Seems appallingly primitive arising from an assumed technology so far beyond our capabilities we may as well fly paper airplanes.. A dream like icon worthy of being excavated from a Mayan temple, an archaic totem, a wishing well for free floating associations ad naseum. No endless cobbling of the hypothetical on the innuendo that comes from the imagination is required. This alleged artifact's writing may as well say "tie your shoes"or "drink ovaltine" The selling of a product packaged to a market of consumers that is meant to self perpetuate it's consumption. It could be Kool Aid.

Part Two
What of the writing itself? Is there a way to determine what if anything it said if it existed and was used in a hypothetical craft navigated by hypothetical extraterrestrials, in a hypothetical mission, that was hypothetically the victim of structural failure, that was hypothetically obtained, in a hypothetical coverup that justify's the creation of more circular logic that is a misdirection of attention? . Does this strike you as goofy rationale for "serious" game playing?

Hows that for a sentence? I have Thomas Wolfe beat by a mile.But that is the domino effect due to the causation of of self hypnotism, the willingness to suspend critical thinking in search of a mirage that is based solely on inference and innuendo.

Again in  Part Two, we will examine this alleged example of "hieroglyphics" that were "hidden" in a hypothetical conspiracy to determine if this  hypothetical artifact can be analyzed  is as well as apply John Nash's Game Theory to this endless Roswell Game that is inadvertently as well as intentionally sucked the wind out of Ufology because it's point is simply self continuation.
Twistable metal has twisted some minds. The real phenomenon is deftly hidden by those who seek it by inane posturing.



Postscript
 This post was intended to be the first of a series on the Roswell Game in order to refute a state of enthrallment that has served as a barrier to applying other methodologies. The more I have thought about this situation, the more I think it is hopeless. I have come to the conclusion that going further down this path of refuting a hypnotic state is a waste of my time. Roswell had pulled me into it's gravitation field by the babble of 99 % of others and so I created this post and now I am pulling back into a more sober state.  It eats time and energy with no return.